Toppers' CopiesPYQ · Coming soon

GS Paper 4 Toppers' Copies

All questions · 57 questions

  1. Open question 178
    Q51 · 10 MARKS

    (b) Explain three moral dilemmas commonly faced by civil servants. Provide ethical frameworks to resolve them effectively.

    Topper: Dev Dudeja · AIR 152 · 2025 · Page 25

  2. Open question 179
    Q52 · 10 MARKS

    (a) “Sporting fairness and gender inclusivity are often on a collision course.” Discuss the ethical dimensions involved in allowing transgender athletes to participate in women’s sports. Should fairness outweigh inclusion?

    Topper: Dev Dudeja · AIR 152 · 2025 · Page 27

  3. Open question 180
    Q53 · 10 MARKS

    (b) How can Buddhist principles guide public servants in maintaining a balance between personal well-being and professional responsibilities in high-pressure governance environments?

    Topper: Dev Dudeja · AIR 152 · 2025 · Page 29

  4. Open question 181
    Q54 · 20 MARKS

    Ravi, a senior IAS officer, is currently serving as the head of the State Health Procurement Division. He is tasked with overseeing the final stages of awarding a high-value government contract for the supply of critical medical equipment to district hospitals. This initiative is part of a public health modernization scheme aimed at strengthening healthcare delivery in underserved areas. Among the shortlisted bidders is a private firm that has submitted a technically sound and competitively priced proposal. However, it has come to light through a media report that Ravi’s daughter is a non-executive board member of this firm. Though she holds no operational or financial responsibilities, her association with the company has raised concerns in the public domain about a potential conflict of interest. At the same time, Ravi is facing covert pressure from a second bidder, a politically well- connected company with a track record of substandard deliveries and cost overruns in past government contracts. Representatives of this company have informally offered Ravi indirect favours, including the prospect of a lucrative post-retirement consultancy role, should he influence the contract award in their favour. Ravi is aware that while there is no formal requirement under departmental rules for recusal in this situation, the All India Services Conduct Rules do emphasize the importance of avoiding not just actual impropriety but even the appearance of impropriety. One of Ravi’s senior colleagues advises him to proceed with the technically strong bid, arguing that his daughter’s role is merely symbolic and that the bid deserves to win on merit. However, the situation escalates when an anonymous complaint is filed by a junior officer to the Chief Secretary, flagging the potential conflict of interest and the possibility of favoritism. The issue starts gaining media traction, casting doubts on the transparency and impartiality of the procurement process. Ravi now finds himself in a dilemma, torn between his professional duty, personal integrity, and public perception. (a) Identify and discuss the ethical issues involved in this case. (b) What are the options available to Ravi? Evaluate each with respect to ethical principles such as objectivity, integrity, accountability, and transparency. (c) What course of action should Ravi take to uphold both procedural propriety and public trust? Justify your decision using ethical reasoning. (d) How should Ravi manage the competing pressures of personal relationships, political influence, and institutional norms without compromising his role as a public servant?

    Topper: Dev Dudeja · AIR 152 · 2025 · Page 31

  5. Open question 182
    Q55 · 20 MARKS

    You have recently been appointed as the senior administrative officer overseeing coastal development planning in a remote and ecologically sensitive island region. The area is globally recognized for its marine biodiversity, dense mangrove forests, endangered wildlife, and the presence of indigenous communities that depend on traditional livelihoods closely linked to the land and sea. It is also a haven for rare species of birds and is surrounded by vibrant coral reefs teeming with marine biodiversity. Protected as a biodiversity hotspot, it has long been revered as a sanctuary for conservationists and eco-tourists alike. A major infrastructure development project has been proposed by a consortium of investors, with support from state authorities. The plan includes a commercial port, luxury tourism infrastructure, and entertainment zones. It is projected to generate significant economic benefits, including employment and increased revenue, and is also being positioned as a _ Strategic asset for maritime trade and national security. However, environmental experts warn of irreversible ecological damage, including threats to nesting sites, coral reefs, and biodiversity corridors. They argue that the development will irreversibly damage the island’s fragile ecosystem. Furthermore, indigenous communities, including the local Adivasi tribes, express deep concern over the project’s impact on their ancestral lands and traditional way of life. They fear that large-scale infrastructure development and an influx of tourists will lead to land grabbing, displacement, and the erosion of their cultural heritage. Civil society organizations have petitioned for a comprehensive environmental impact assessment and genuine stakeholder consultation. Whereas supporters of the project highlight its strategic importance for India’s economic growth and national security. They argue that the project will enhance India’s maritime infrastructure, strengthen coastal security, and stimulate trade and investment in the region. As the officer responsible for coordinating the project’s evaluation and recommendations, you are under pressure from political and corporate interests to fast-track approvals. At the same time, you are aware of your duty to uphold constitutional values, protect vulnerable communities, and ensure sustainable governance. (a) What are the core ethical dilemmas present in the case’? (b) Discuss options available to you and give the merits and demerits. (c) As a senior public servant assigned to coordinate the project, outline the steps you would take to ensure ethical and evidence-based governance. (d) Suggest long-term policy and institutional reforms that could help resolve such conflicts.

    Topper: Dev Dudeja · AIR 152 · 2025 · Page 41

  6. Open question 183
    Q56 · 20 MARKS

    You are a senior civil servant in the Ministry of Information & Broadcasting. Your 17-year- old daughter, an intelligent and sensitive student of Class 12, has been an avid follower of popular influencers and motivational speakers. Recently, she became deeply interested in a popular podcast show hosted by a well-known social media figure, Kunal Bhalla. The show claims to champion “free thinking” and covers topics like hustle culture, masculinity, personal transformation, and anti-institutional narratives. Over time, your daughter’s behaviour begins to change. She withdraws from academic interests, begins idolising internet influencers, and adopts rigid opinions about success, failure, and mental health. She starts rejecting family advice, refuses to appear for her board preparatory exams, and argues that “school is irrelevant in the age of free minds.” Concerned, you and your spouse try to reason with her, but she accuses you of being “closed-minded.” Matters come to head when you are alerted by your ministry’s media monitoring cell about a viral video clip where your daughter is seen giving an interview on a fringe podcast platform, endorsing radical views on education, politics, and civil services. The clip drew public attention because of your designation, and journalists began speculating about a “generational rebellion” within the bureaucracy. Meanwhile, the influencer, Kunal Bhalla, publicly praises your daughter as “the new voice of youth dissent,” but refuses to take accountability for his platform’s role in shaping her worldview. Social media is split, some defend her right to free thought, while others accuse such influencers of normalising disrespect for institutions and romanticizing shallow intellectualism, Your colleagues advice silence, but your daughter now wants to drop out of school and intern with a podcast network. (a) What are the key ethical issues involved in the way “free thinking” is promoted by influencers on social media, especially for impressionable youth? (b) What should be the role of public figures in responding to the misuse or distortion of influential platforms in the name of free expression? (c) Suggest a policy framework or guidelines for responsible influencer content aimed at youth without curbing intellectual freedom.

    Topper: Dev Dudeja · AIR 152 · 2025 · Page 46

  7. Open question 184
    Q57 · 20 MARKS

    Raghav is the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of a fast-growing tech company in South Asia that designs and deploys AI systems for public services like education and policing. Recently, the company secured a large government contract to implement facial recognition and predictive analytics systems in public schools and police departments. The project is significant for the company’s growth and is being closely monitored by international investors and government agencies. However, two major concerns have emerged. First, internal audits show that the AI systems are not adequately trained on local data. They frequently misidentify individuals from tribal and minority backgrounds and unfairly flag behavioral issues among students from these communities. The software also lacks support for vernacular languages and neurodivergent users, raising concerns about exclusion and discrimination. Second, environmental groups have raised objections to the company’s rising carbon footprint due to the expansion of energy-intensive data centers. There has been a 42% increase in emissions over the last two years. Raghav now faces a serious ethical dilemma: whether to push ahead with deployment to maintain momentum and company interests, or pause and resolve these concerns, knowing it may slow down progress and create internal friction. (a) Identify and discuss the ethical issues involved in the case. (b) Critically examine the options available to Raghav in this situation. (c) Which of the above options should Raghav adopt and why? Justify your answer using principles of ethics and professional responsibility.

    Topper: Dev Dudeja · AIR 152 · 2025 · Page 51