IASifyIASify
Sign in
Toppers' CopiesPYQ · Coming soon

GS Paper 4 Toppers' Copies

All questions · 57 questions

  1. Open question 91
    Q21 · 20 MARKS

    a senior leader of the ruling party, holds significant power over the corporation’s functioning. Rajesh soon learns about several dubious tenders and large-scale irregularities in awarding contracts for the city’s solid waste management project. He notices that payments have been hastily cleared to companies with questionable credentials, despite glaring deficiencies in their work. One day, a senior councillor belonging to a rival political party approaches Rajesh and shares a set of audio recordings and internal emails that purportedly show the mayor asking for kickbacks from contractors in exchange for lucrative garbage collection contracts. Rajesh also recalls the same contractors’ payments being pushed through undcy the mayor’s orders, bypassing due process. When Rajesh asks the Councillor why he doesn’t bring this evidence to the media or the anti-corruption bureau himself, the Councillor shrugs it off, hinting that his hands are tied politically but Rajesh can “earn a hero’s image” by blowing the whistle. He subtly promises that if his party comes to power in the upcoming municipal elections, Rajesh’s loyalty will be rewarded with an important posting and career security. Meanwhile, local media has started sniffing around the irregularities, and Rajesh’s silence could make him appear complicit. His own staff is divided; some urge him to maintain the status quo for personal safety, while a few junior officers privately want him to act boldly and clean up the system. Adding to his dilemma, Rajesh’s elderly parents are dependent on him, and another sudden transf>r could make their care difficult. (a) Identify the key ethical dilemmas faced by Rajesh in this situation. (b) What are the options available to Rajesh to deal with the situation? Evaluate each option with its merits and demerits. (c) In the context of this case, discuss the ethical challenges of whistleblowing for public servants in India. (d) What institutional reforms can strengthen ethical conduct and protect honest officers?

    Topper: Sandeep Badad · AIR 82 · 2025 · Page 36

  2. Open question 92
    Q22 · 20 MARKS

    . Neha, an IAS officer, is serving as the District Magistrate (DM) of a bustling metropolitan district. Among her wide-ranging responsibilities, she also oversees the functioning of the Municipal Sanitation Department, which employs hundreds of sanitation workers, drivers, and daily wage laborers responsible for keeping the city clean and waste-free. One morning, a disturbing case landed on Neha’s desk. Rajiv, a municipal garbage truck driver, died following a violent street altercation while on duty. On that day, Rajiv was driving his garbage collection truck through a crowded market street. He got into a heated argument with a street vendor who had encroached upon the road, obstructing the truck’s passage. Eyewitness reports aiid CCTV footage revealed that Rajiv, known for his short temper, started the verbal abuse, which escalated into a physical fight. Despite bystanders trying to intervene, the scuffle turned bloody. Both Rajiv and the vendor were hospitalized with serious injuries. Rajiv succumbed to a head injury later that night, while the vendor survived. A police investigation and the Municipai Sanitation Department’s inquiry confirmed that Rajiv’s death resulted from his own misconduct and violent behavior while on duty. A post-mortem report further revealed that Rajiv had consumed alcohol while on duty and was under the influence at the time of the altercation, which is a clear violation of service rules that strictly prohibit drinking during work hours, especially for drivers operating municipal vehicles. According to the department’s standing rules, extra ex-gratia compensation and family employment are given only in cases of death caused by workplace accidents or occupational hazards, not deaths resulting from personal fights, gross misconduct, or negligence such as working under the influence of alcohol. However, Rajiv’s death left behind a dependent family: his elderly parents, his wife, and two children, one in college, the other in high school. His wife and children, shattered by his sudden death, argue that Rajiv died during duty hours and the family must not be punished for his mistake. The Sanitation Workers’ Union has taken up the issue aggressively, demanding the same full ex-gratia compensation that is given to other drivers who dieon duty, plus a permanent government job for Rajiv’s elder son. When the department refused, citing the clear rule violation, the union declared an indefinite strike, bringing garbage collection to a standstill. The strike has now entered its tenth day, and the city’s streets are overflowing with waste, creating serious health and public order concerns. Neha is under pressure to resolve the crisis while balancing legal norms, humanitarian concerns, and public interest. (a) Evaluate each option with its merits and demerits available to Neha. (b) If you were in Neha’s position, what decision would you take? Justify your decision with appropriate ethical reasoning and principles. (c) What steps can Neha take to prevent similar incidents and ethical conflicts in the future in the Municipal Sanitation Department?

    Topper: Sandeep Badad · AIR 82 · 2025 · Page 41

  3. Open question 93
    Q23 · 20 MARKS

    Aarav was a young man in his early twenties, working as a promising IAS officer recently posted in a prominent district. His family, well-respected and influential in their community, arranged his marriage to Priya, a bright and educated young woman from a nearby town. The marriage was celebrated lavishly, with local leaders, senior bureaucrats, and influential people attending the grand ceremony. To the outside world, Aarav and Priya seemed like an ideal couple. However, behind closed doors, Aarav’s parents soon began demanding additional dowry shortly after the wedding. Despite their respectable social standing and Aarav’s prestigious position in government service, they were never satisfied with what Priya’s family had given at the time of marriage. They repeatedly reminded Priya of the ‘promised gifts’ that they claimed were incomplete: a new car, more gold jewelry, and financial help to buy an upscale apartment in the city. Aarav, caught between his duty as a husband and his deep-seated conditioning to obey and please his parents, often tried to iiediate but rarely stood up firmly for Priya. He rationalized that as an officer entrusted with maintaining law and order in sociviy, he should avoid any scandal that could tarnish his family’s reputation and his own career prospects. He was raised to believe that family honor and parental wishes were paramount Meanwhile, Priya bore the brunt of daily taunts, subtle threats, and constant emotional harassment. Her mother-in-law would belittle her for “bringing shame” to their family by not fulfilling her family’s so-called promises. Whenever Priya’s parents visited, they were met with humiliation and veiled threats about sending Priya back if they did not arrange more money. Fearing for their daughter’s marriage and social standing, Priya’s father sold part of his ancestral land to provide additional cash and jewelry. But the demands never stopped. Aarav, though fully 2. vare of the injustice and the fact that dowry harassment was illegal under Indian law chose silence over confrontation, convincing himself that confronting his parents would shatterfamily harmony and invite public shame. As the pressure uiounted, Priya’s mental health deteriorated. She grew withdrawn and anxious, confiding in her parents about the relentless harassment but begging them not to take any legal action. She feared social stigma, public scandal, and the impact it might have on Aarav’s reputation and career. Aarav, meanwhile, continued to live with the moral conflict between his role as an upholder of the law and his inability to protect his own wife from a crime happening within his own household. (a) Discuss the ethical dilemmas faced by Aarav in this scenario. (b) Suggest institutional and social mechanisms that can prevent dowry harassment cases like this and support victims who fear social stigma if they take legal action. (ec) Examine how social conditioning and family honor often influence ethical decision-making in Indian families.

    Topper: Sandeep Badad · AIR 82 · 2025 · Page 46

  4. Open question 94
    Q24 · 20 MARKS

    a young Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) recently transferred to Neelgram, has ordered emergency measures to ration and purify the remaining potable water and clamp down on illegal extraction of groundwater to ensure enough safe water for drinking and health camps. However, when her enforcement teams start sealing unauthorized borewells on farmland to prevent further depletion, a large group of distressed farmers storms her office, accusing her of double standards for ignoring the big bottled water companies and luxury housing societies on the town’s outskirts that continue tapping deep aquifers around the clock under old permits allegedly renewed through bribes. The farmers claim they are being pushed to ruin just to keep swimming pools full and bottled water businesses profitable. Meanwhile, local hotels warn that shutting their supply will lead to layoffs of hundreds of daily-wage workers already reeling from the flood damage. Political leaders privately pressurize Ananya to avoid any action that might anger influential industrialists and real estate developers. To complicate matters further, she discovers some lower-rung officials have been pocketing hush money to overlook illegal borewells. With rural families queuing up for clean water tankers and local schools forced to close due to unsafe drinking water, Ananya must now grapple with the ethical dilemma of conserving critical water reserves, enforcing rules impartially, protecting poor farmers’ livelihoods, resisting powerful vested interests, ensuring continued employment fo r daily-wage workers, and upholding public trust in the administration during a fragile recovery phase. (a) Identify and discuss the major ethical dilemmas faced by Ananya. (b) Briefly describe major laws or policies enacted by the Government of India to ensure sustainable water management. (c) Suggest a balanced course of action that Ananya can adopt to ensure equitable water distribution, prevent misuse of groundwater, protect vulnerable livelihoods, and restore public trust.

    Topper: Sandeep Badad · AIR 82 · 2025 · Page 51

  5. Open question 95
    Q25 · 20 MARKS

    (a) Identify and briefly discuss the key ethical issues involved in this case. (b) What options are available to Ritika? Critically Analyse each option. (c) Suggest a course of action that Ritika should take in this situation. Justify your answer with suitable ethical principles and values.

    Topper: Sandeep Badad · AIR 82 · 2025 · Page 56

  6. Open question 96
    Q26 · 10 MARKS

    \ le | 7 uestions in NOT MORE than the word limit specified for each in Sd | enthesis. Content of the answer is more important than its length.) ne AS piotechnology blurs the lines between healing and enhancement. nature and Fs gign. the ethical foundations of science face unprecedented scrutiny.” Critically examine the role of Bio Ethics in dealing with the ethical challenges posed by javancerents in biotechnology.

    Topper: Akash Kumar · AIR 101 · 2025 · Page 5

  7. Open question 97
    Q27 · 10 MARKS

    ahical indifference.” In the conte,:: sks ic interplay tase the context of public service. critically Analyse how ne ™ cen imegrity and objectivity shapes ethical decision- “ne. aki

    Topper: Akash Kumar · AIR 101 · 2025 · Page 9

  8. Open question 98
    Q28 · 10 MARKS

    his part) | nile public- -Private Partnershi |}, ut Oe ‘ _ lines between public thes Promise e efficiency and innovation, mn, they ¢ vten _a| issues involved in Ppp Crest and private profit.” Critically examine the ye ntability. and equity beet Of governance, How can trans; eial “ney. ul ree en ws like health, education, (IN such collaborations, especially in essential and infrastructure? (10 marks

    Topper: Akash Kumar · AIR 101 · 2025 · Page 11

  9. Open question 99
    Q29 · 10 MARKS

    Seton Warhog —! mg eS is not the doctri “a ee - it) Is ctrine of — be may make ourselves wonkoen ve may make ourselves happy. but eo. NOL happiness. he Ppiness.~ Immanuel Kant

    Topper: Akash Kumar · AIR 101 · 2025 · Page 17

  10. Open question 100
    Q30 · 10 MARKS

    ‘Don't write ‘ynything in ‘his part) ahtor Hormple beande Mp cial fer ds (yaad ung“ / country grappling with m jus institutions raise ticeeince! Constraints. the vast surplus funds held by vacallY examine the ethical ing ethical questions about social responsibil.” xi - constitutional ‘ J iteatinne¢ "ing surplus funds from religious i AI, and socio-cultural implications of tiliZs E cavilid Weal M religious institutions for public ial Inpho’ ys educa altheare? s for public welfare purposes such

    Topper: Akash Kumar · AIR 101 · 2025 · Page 19